As Google’s Hummingbird update places more weight on social signals for search rankings, Google+ could become more important for marketers looking to boost SEO.
In an SES Denver panel discussion titled “Insights Into Future Search Trends,” Merry Morud, social advertising director for aimClear, said that social signals have replaced links in importance for SEO. “In the old days of SEO, link-building was the ultimate, but with social, SEO becomes democratized, more of an aggregate of symbols and authority.”
Because of these changes in the way search is ranked, Google+ might become a more important tool than Facebook for marketers looking to see a rise in their rankings. “Google+ is not a joke,” said Morud. “It’s not going away. If you are not active in Google+, start now. Google gets its purest social signals in Google+, and they can often impact SEO more than Facebook.”
And as advertisers see recommendations from Facebook count for less in terms of social signals in search, their ads on the platform could be further impacted by rampant “accidental clicks” on mobile, which could lead to inaccurate data.
“For social ad placements in mobile, Facebook creates desktop, mobile, and Right-Rail ads, but they heavily weight for mobile views,” said Morud. The problem with the uneven weighting is that “accidental clicks happen a lot. There’s a lot of discrepancy between clicks and actual website visits.” For example, one of Morud’s clients found that of Facebook’s reported 850 ad clicks, only four came from desktop, which indicates that many of the clicks may have happened by mistake. The discrepancy, according to Morud, could be attributed to what she termed “fat finger syndrome,” or accidental clicks that don’t actually result in page views.